IR35 – the basics

IR35 -Self-Employed / Employed Status

It is key that all businesses are aware of the legislation surrounding workers, whether they be employed, self employed or temporary / fixed term workers.

UK employment law draws no distinction between full time workers and part-time workers. They both attract the same protections with regards to employment rights. Part-time workers also have a right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of their part-time status. The distinction that is drawn with UK employment law is between employed and self employed workers. This is often a grey area and a potential mindful for small, medium, and large businesses.

It is not sufficient to merely label a worker employed or self-employed and think that will satisfy the revenue. An employer must properly assess the working situation that determines whether the worker is employed or self-employed. If the revenue were to overtake issue with the manner in which the business is treating the worker, they would not look solely at the contract for their status, but they would look behind that to the actual working relationship.

In the late 1990s, a large number of employees, began setting up limited companies, leaving their jobs and returning immediately as a Contractor purely in order to avoid tax. This was a well known practice and often encourage by companies. As a result the government introduced the IR35 legislation as a prevention.

The legislation applies if you carry out work through an intermediary, this is normally a limited company, to an end user where if there were a contract between you personally and the end user than that would be seen as an employment relationship. Potentially the legislation prevents worker using intermediary companies solely to avoid tax. It does not stop genuine freelance workers from establishing intermediary companies and working in that manner. The legislation is, however, a difficult area of law and it is important that companies seek advice at an early stage.

The test of personal service i.e. if the worker was providing service directly to the company would that establish an employment relationship is, a question of fact, and will turn on the appropriate circumstances. There are a number of factors which would go to suggest that a worker would be an employee, these include:

  • A provision of equipment – whether the worker provides their own equipment or the company provides it.
  •  Length of arrangement – it is more likely that an employee would have an indefinite contract whereas the contractors would normally have a set period.
  •  Benefits, do they receive paid leave, pension schemes, medical healthcare etc.
  •  Mutual obligations – does the company have an obligation to provide work, and does the worker have an obligation to carry out the work, or are they entitled to decide when they work with the company under no obligation to offer work at a particular stage.
  • Control – whilst a self-employed worker may be under some control from the company and not be to the same extent as an employee, the company will need to look at the way in which the service are performed and tasks carried out. Are they set out as required?
  •  Substitution – if the worker is allowed to substitute someone in their place, or engage the help of others. If they are then this would be a factor suggesting a self-employed relationship.

These are just some of the factors that can be taken into consideration when considering the status of the worker. The company should seek advice to assist to determine this.

If the company is engaging someone through an intermediary then there are likely to be two contracts involved. The first contract between the intermediary company and the worker are on the second company with a contract between the company and the intermediary for the provision of services. The revenue is most likely to look at the contract between the intermediary and the company, essentially trying to establish whether the company are in fact engaging with an intermediary or whether they are treating someone as an employee but merely using the intermediary arrangement as a method for the worker to evade income tax. There are number of provisions that should be drafted into this contract to ensure that it is IR35 compliance, these include the issues raised above, such as stating quite clearly there is no mutuality or obligations to provide or undertake work, outlining the treatment for taxation and the right to substitute a worker or in your place. Advice should be sought before agreeing an appropriate contract.

If IR35 applies, then income tax and national insurance contributions will be required. The revenue may also charge interest and penalties to the intermediary companies on overdue tax / national insurance contributions.

If the revenue decide that the company has knowingly treated their workers incorrectly i.e. as self-employed, with a view to evading the appropriate tax payments then they may be liable to very significant fines on the company, amongst other sanctions. For this reason the company needs to be very clear on their treatment of workers.

Consumer rights & law – 10 tips

10 Frequently Asked Questions on Consumer Law and Consumer Rights

1.    I purchased some items in a shop, but they are faulty. Can I return them?

Ignore the Policy that the shop has. Whatever their Policy, it cannot affect your Statutory Rights. If they try to say that their Policy overrides your Statutory Rights, this is untrue.  If on their Policy, they do not state that their Policy ‘does not affect your Statutory Rights’, point out to them that by not doing so, it is an offence, and if they continue to ignore you, contact your local Trading Standards Officer and report them for this misdemeanour.

2.    I have lost my receipt, but have a Bank Statement showing the date I purchase the goods from a particular shop. Will that be acceptable ?

You have to generally show proof of purchase., Ideally a receipt is the best form of proof, but failing that, a Bank Statement showing the amount paid on a particular day, should be sufficient.

3.    What are my Statutory Rights ?

Your Statutory Rights are those rights conferred to you in Law under various Act of Parliament, primarily the Sale of Goods and Services Act. Section 12, 13, and 14, reflect that what you purchase has to be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, at a reasonable price, and will last a reasonable length of time.

4.    I bought some jeans and they fell apart by the seams after only 2 weeks of purchase. Can I get my money back ?

Provided that you did not cause the seams to open by for example buying jeans too small for you and doing your best to fit in them, or else doing marathon training in them (as examples), you should be able to get a full refund.

5.    The shop will only exchange goods and will not refund me my money. Can they do that ?

They can certainly offer you such an exchange. They have to place you in a position that you would have been had the product been of satisfactory quality. If you are unhappy with the goods and you persist, you will get your money back.

6.    The shop refuses to refund me my money ?

You have recourse to try and mediate the matter, or else as a final resort to go to Court. Before doing so, Speak to your local Citizens Advice Bureau, or a local Solicitor to understand your rights, the costs involved, and the risks of proceeding.

7.    I want to go to Court. How do I do it ?

In 1999, Lord Woolf, overhauled the Civil Procedure Rules and created Pre-Action Protocols in order that the Parties to a dispute could fully understand the claim being made and issues involved, and could try and find a way to resolve matters without going to Court. If you do not follow the Pre-Action Protocol, the Courts usually take a dim view and if costs are awarded, not following such protocols is likely to count against you.

8.    Is there a Pre-Action Protocol that applies specifically to Consumer Law ?

There is not such a specific Pre-Action Protocol, but in the absence of a specific protocol, then Annex A at Paragraph 4 to the Practice Directions of the Pre-Action Protocols applies and you need to follow it, and set your case out accordingly, giving reasonable times for the offending Party to respond.

9.    I have exhausted the Pre-Action Protocol, and want to go to Court. How do I do it ?

If your claim is under £5,000 the Small Claims Procedure is likely to apply. This means that some days before a hearing of this matter, you will need to mutually exchange all documents and Statements you wish to rely upon, and also file a copy with the Court. Also, in a small claims procedure, legal costs are unlikely to be recovered unless the other side has behaved unreasonably, in which case the Court has discretion to award costs.

10.    Should I ever compromise my case ?

There are various adages which apply to Consumer Law and disputes generally: ‘There is no smoke without fire’…’This is a case of 6 of 1 and 1/2 a dozen of the other, or a case of 6 and 2, 3s’….If a shop offers you some compensation or monetary refund, think long and hard before rejecting it. Going to Court and following the procedure can be daunting and takes up lots of time, usually far more time than you would have wanted to spend. Consider the offer carefully and it is always sensible to take advice from a Citizens Advice Bureau, or a Solicitor.

This article courtesy of David Rosen, Solicitors & Head of litigation at Darlingtons, Solicitors in London.

E-petitions to try and change the law

Get 100,000 e- signatures on a Petition to Government

A new website enabling the public to lodge a petition to the Government electronically online has gone live. The plan is that a petition which gets 100,000 supporters ought to result in a debate on that issue in Parliament

Apparently, Government departments will moderate the petitions, with oversight from the office of the leader of the commons.

We wonder whether the system might be hijacked by people using it to sell petition votes like “likes” on facebook ?

Legal Ombudsman

Complaints to the Legal Ombudsman

In the latest report from the Legal ombudsman, the “usual suspects” were present in terms of the makeup of complaints, which were as follows :-

  • Conveyancing accounted for over 20% of investigations
  • Family law came second with just over 19%
  • Next comes wills, at just over 13%
  • Litigation complaints made up just over 10%
  • Making up the other largest categories were personal injury and employment law
  • More complaints were received based on alleged failure to provide advice than on excessive fees or delays

The report discloses that nearly 3,800 complaints were investigated out of a total of over 38,000 complaints received.

Don’t overstate your case

Interesting case in the employment tribunal

A recent case in the employment tribunal perhaps highlights 2 important points for employees who are having problems at work. Of course, such situations are difficult for both employers and employees and they can all too easily become very personal. What can easily happen in these situations is that :-

  1. The employee makes themselves unmanageable and back themselves into a corner, this can result in the employer having ultimate grounds for dismissal as long as the employer complies with suitable process and acts within the range of reasonable responses. The employee may become hostile in these circumstances to colleagues or bosses and may lodge repeated complaints as the employee becomes increasingly agitated and frustrated.
  2. As a corollary to the above, post dismissal, whether by constructive or unfair dismissal, there is a tendency to make as many claims as possible in the employment tribunal, particularly due to the no costs rule in the tribunal i.e regardless of who wins or loses each aspect of the case there are no legal costs implications in terms of being ordered to pay the opponent’s costs except for exceptional cases. Consequently, many employees will claim for discrimination and other possible employment claims aside from unfair dismissal. This tactic can sometimes backfire, giving the employment tribunal a certain impression of an applicant.

In the particular case in question, Electrical engineer Bijan Zakeri worked for Tyne & Wear Metro owner Nexus for 28 years until retiring on ill health grounds in February last year. He alleged negative treatment from bosses and colleagues after he raised concerns about safety, maintenance and machinery training. He also claimed constructive dismissal and disability discrimination against Nexus – allegations the organisation disputed. The Tribunal found that the dispute with the former employer had become an “obsession”. He did succeed on certain claims, but this case is an example perhaps of the above as the tribunal commented that his obsessive and nitpicking approach to his duties and those of others, made him virtually impossible to manage.